![]() Question 1: What is the advantage of using the ParaView instead of VTK as a server? This example also uses the ParaViewWeb JavaScript client. This example provides two different servers, a ParaView-based and a VTKWeb-based. I have found some examples on the internet demonstrating remote rendering, but the more I explore them, the more questions they raise. I guess the two options are the ParaView and VTK clients/servers. The problem now is that I do not know which technology I should use to do this. Because of this, I think that server-side rendering is the way to go, and maybe in the future, for the small cubes, also implement client-side rendering using some kind of LOD scheme. I guess for the small cubes I could use some kind of LOD scheme, but for the big ones, a LOD approach won’t be good enough (especially for slow connections). Given the size and number of data cubes, I can’t just fetch the cubes on the client and render them using vtk.js. In other words, this is a multi-user application. Furthermore, I want multiple users to be able to render a different cube at the same time. I want the user to be able to select the name of a data cube and almost immediately see a volumetric visualisation which can move around, manipulate, and even change transfer functions etc. The data cubes are already located on the server. The number of the data cubes is about 10,000. The size of these data cubes is between 5MB and 4GB, with the majority of them being around 100MB. Here is a description of what I need to do: I want to perform interactive volume rendering of a series of 3D data sets (data cubes). After knowing which are the right tools to use, then I will only focus on them for the implementation. So, I was wondering if someone can provide advice as to which are the most appropriate technologies for my use-case. I have already started creating some prototypes using different technologies, but I have problems with all of them. Furthermore, I am having a hard time finding documentation for the components my application needs. However I am really overwhelmed with all the information and the reading I need to do in order to even begin to understand how all these technologies work. After some reading it appears that VTK, Paraview, and related technologies are the way to go. Blade templates contain HTML as well as Blade directives that allow you to easily echo values, create "if" statements, iterate over data, and more.I want to develop a Web-based application which performs interactive/real-time volume rendering on a remote server and displays the result on a Web browser. blade.php extension informs the framework that the file contains a Blade template. blade.php extension in your application's resources/views directory. You may create a view by placing a file with the. ![]() In addition, the Laravel Bootcamp provides a full demonstration of building a Laravel application powered by Inertia, including examples in Vue and React. Our Breeze and Jetstream starter kits give you a great starting point for your next Laravel application powered by Inertia. Laravel makes this painless thanks to Inertia, a library that makes it a cinch to tie your React / Vue frontend to your Laravel backend without the typical complexities of building an SPA. Instead of writing their frontend templates in PHP via Blade, many developers have begun to prefer to write their templates using React or Vue. Looking for more information on how to write Blade templates? Check out the full Blade documentation to get started.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |